Flat grade share
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 94.2% Favoured
Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon vs Regensburg Marathon 32K
A data-led head-to-head using sourced race facts and available derived figures under one published methodology.
Data current as ofRegensburg Marathon Half Marathon or Regensburg Marathon 32K — which comes out ahead?
Regensburg Marathon 32K has the stronger available profile on flat grade share and course flatness.
Route comparison snapshot
Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- Mapped route
- Held
- Elevation profile
- Held
- course flatness
- 0.4%
- flat grade share
- 81.1%
- lower ascent
- 116 m
- climbing density
- 5.5 m/km
- net elevation
- 0 m
- maximum grade
- 9.5%
Regensburg Marathon 32K
- Mapped route
- Held
- Elevation profile
- Held
- course flatness
- 0.1% Favoured
- flat grade share
- 94.2% Favoured
- lower ascent
- 92 m
- climbing density
- 2.9 m/km
- net elevation
- 0 m
- maximum grade
- 6.4%
| Metric | Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon | Regensburg Marathon 32K |
|---|---|---|
| Flat grade share | 81.1% | 94.2% ✓ |
| GAP factor (% slower than flat) | 0.4% | 0.1% ✓ |
| Uphill share | 9.3% | 2.6% |
| Steep-up share | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| Downhill share | 9.5% | 3.1% |
| Total ascent (m) | 116 m | 92 m |
| Climbing density (m/km) | 5.5 m/km | 2.9 m/km |
| Longest climb length (m) | 260 m | 880 m |
| Longest climb gain (m) | 10 m | 16 m |
| Longest climb average grade | 4.0% | 1.9% |
| Total descent (m) | 116 m | 91 m |
| Net elevation (m) | 0 m | 0 m |
| Max absolute grade | 9.5% | 6.4% |
| Start elevation (m) | 335 m | 336 m |
| Finish elevation (m) | 335 m | 336 m |
| Scenic score | 83/100 | 83/100 |
| Conditions | 82/100 | 82/100 |
GAP factor (% slower than flat)
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 0.1% Favoured
Uphill share
Steep-up share
Downhill share
Total ascent (m)
Climbing density (m/km)
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 2.9 m/km
Longest climb length (m)
Longest climb gain (m)
Longest climb average grade
Total descent (m)
Net elevation (m)
Max absolute grade
Start elevation (m)
Finish elevation (m)
Scenic score
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 83/100
Conditions
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 82/100
Only metrics available for at least one side are shown. A ✓ marks the better value for each metric (higher-is-better aware). Scores are out of 100 when available. Ascent, climbing density, max absolute grade and median finish describe course or field context and are not marked as better or worse.
Same-distance comparisons are most meaningful; cross-distance metrics are contextual.
Race facts that change the decision
| Fact | Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon | Regensburg Marathon 32K |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule | Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-05-17 (legacy event-level date). | Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-05-17 (legacy event-level date). |
| Location | Regensburg, Germany | Regensburg, Germany |
| Actual distance | 21.1 km | 31.6 km |
| raceindex.org mapped route held | Held | Held |
| raceindex.org elevation profile held | Held | Held |
| Surface | Predominantly asphalt, with an approximately 1.2 km cobblestone (Kopfsteinpflaster) section through the old town. | Predominantly asphalt, with an approximately 1.2 km cobblestone (Kopfsteinpflaster) section through the old town. |
| Scenery | City, Riverside, Historic, Waterfront, Parkland, Countryside | City, Riverside, Historic, Waterfront, Parkland, Countryside |
| Atmosphere | Big City, Scenic Tour, Community | Big City, Scenic Tour, Community |
| Total ascent | 116 m | 92 m |
| Climbing density | 5.5 m/km | 2.9 m/km |
| Total descent | 116 m | 91 m |
| Net elevation | 0 m | 0 m |
| Max absolute grade | 9.5% | 6.4% |
| Flat grade share | 81.1% | 94.2% |
| GAP factor | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Entry model | Open | Open |
Schedule
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-05-17 (legacy event-level date).
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-05-17 (legacy event-level date).
Location
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- Regensburg, Germany
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- Regensburg, Germany
Actual distance
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 21.1 km
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 31.6 km
raceindex.org mapped route held
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- Held
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- Held
raceindex.org elevation profile held
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- Held
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- Held
Surface
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- Predominantly asphalt, with an approximately 1.2 km cobblestone (Kopfsteinpflaster) section through the old town.
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- Predominantly asphalt, with an approximately 1.2 km cobblestone (Kopfsteinpflaster) section through the old town.
Scenery
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- City, Riverside, Historic, Waterfront, Parkland, Countryside
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- City, Riverside, Historic, Waterfront, Parkland, Countryside
Atmosphere
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- Big City, Scenic Tour, Community
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- Big City, Scenic Tour, Community
Total ascent
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 116 m
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 92 m
Climbing density
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 5.5 m/km
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 2.9 m/km
Total descent
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 116 m
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 91 m
Net elevation
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 0 m
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 0 m
Max absolute grade
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 9.5%
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 6.4%
Flat grade share
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 81.1%
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 94.2%
GAP factor
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- 0.4%
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- 0.1%
Entry model
- Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon
- Open
- Regensburg Marathon 32K
- Open
Facts are shown only when they exist in the sourced race record; Not held means no sourced value is held for that race.
Common questions
Which is flatter, Regensburg Marathon Half Marathon or Regensburg Marathon 32K?
Regensburg Marathon 32K has the lower GAP factor, making it the flatter course on our route model and more favourable on gradient alone.