Flat grade share
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 60.8% Favoured
Reims Champagne Run Marathon vs Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
A data-led head-to-head using sourced race facts and available derived figures under one published methodology.
Data current as ofReims Champagne Run Marathon or Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon — which comes out ahead?
Reims Champagne Run Marathon has the stronger available profile on flat grade share and course flatness.
Route comparison snapshot
Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Mapped route
- Held
- Elevation profile
- Held
- course flatness
- -0.4% Favoured
- flat grade share
- 60.8% Favoured
- lower ascent
- 389 m
- climbing density
- 9.3 m/km
- net elevation
- -161 m
- maximum grade
- 17.4%
Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Mapped route
- Held
- Elevation profile
- Held
- course flatness
- 2.8%
- flat grade share
- 50.1%
- lower ascent
- 1,343 m
- climbing density
- 15.4 m/km
- net elevation
- 9 m
- maximum grade
- 21.0%
| Metric | Reims Champagne Run Marathon | Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon |
|---|---|---|
| Flat grade share | 60.8% ✓ | 50.1% |
| GAP factor (% slower than flat) | -0.4% ✓ | 2.8% |
| Uphill share | 16.7% | 25.4% |
| Steep-up share | 3.5% | 8.0% |
| Downhill share | 22.5% | 24.5% |
| Total ascent (m) | 389 m | 1,343 m |
| Climbing density (m/km) | 9.3 m/km | 15.4 m/km |
| Longest climb length (m) | 2,250 m | 1,560 m |
| Longest climb gain (m) | 78 m | 113 m |
| Longest climb average grade | 3.5% | 7.3% |
| Total descent (m) | 551 m | 1,333 m |
| Net elevation (m) | -161 m | 9 m |
| Max absolute grade | 17.4% | 21.0% |
| Start elevation (m) | 249 m | 79 m |
| Finish elevation (m) | 88 m | 88 m |
| Scenic score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Conditions | 86/100 | 86/100 |
GAP factor (% slower than flat)
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- -0.4% Favoured
Uphill share
Steep-up share
Downhill share
Total ascent (m)
Climbing density (m/km)
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 9.3 m/km
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 15.4 m/km
Longest climb length (m)
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 2,250 m
Longest climb gain (m)
Longest climb average grade
Total descent (m)
Net elevation (m)
Max absolute grade
Start elevation (m)
Finish elevation (m)
Scenic score
Conditions
Only metrics available for at least one side are shown. A ✓ marks the better value for each metric (higher-is-better aware). Scores are out of 100 when available. Ascent, climbing density, max absolute grade and median finish describe course or field context and are not marked as better or worse.
Same-distance comparisons are most meaningful; cross-distance metrics are contextual.
Race facts that change the decision
| Fact | Reims Champagne Run Marathon | Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule | Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-10-10 (legacy event-level date). | Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-10-10 (legacy event-level date). |
| Location | Reims, France | Reims, France |
| Actual distance | 42 km | 87 km |
| raceindex.org mapped route held | Held | Held |
| raceindex.org elevation profile held | Held | Held |
| Elevation character | Rolling | Hilly |
| Terrain | Trail | Trail |
| Scenery | City, Vineyard, Historic, Forest, Countryside | Vineyard, City, Historic, Forest, Countryside |
| Atmosphere | Festival, Destination, Scenic Tour | Festival, Destination, Scenic Tour |
| Technicality | Unavailable | Moderate |
| Total ascent | 389 m | 1,343 m |
| Climbing density | 9.3 m/km | 15.4 m/km |
| Total descent | 551 m | 1,333 m |
| Net elevation | -161 m | 9 m |
| Max absolute grade | 17.4% | 21.0% |
| Flat grade share | 60.8% | 50.1% |
| GAP factor | -0.4% | 2.8% |
| Entry model | Open | Open |
Schedule
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-10-10 (legacy event-level date).
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-10-10 (legacy event-level date).
Location
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Reims, France
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Reims, France
Actual distance
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 42 km
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 87 km
raceindex.org mapped route held
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Held
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Held
raceindex.org elevation profile held
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Held
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Held
Elevation character
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Rolling
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Hilly
Terrain
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Trail
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Trail
Scenery
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- City, Vineyard, Historic, Forest, Countryside
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Vineyard, City, Historic, Forest, Countryside
Atmosphere
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Festival, Destination, Scenic Tour
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Festival, Destination, Scenic Tour
Technicality
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Unavailable
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Moderate
Total ascent
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 389 m
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 1,343 m
Climbing density
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 9.3 m/km
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 15.4 m/km
Total descent
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 551 m
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 1,333 m
Net elevation
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- -161 m
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 9 m
Max absolute grade
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 17.4%
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 21.0%
Flat grade share
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- 60.8%
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 50.1%
GAP factor
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- -0.4%
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- 2.8%
Entry model
- Reims Champagne Run Marathon
- Open
- Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon
- Open
Facts are shown only when they exist in the sourced race record; Not held means no sourced value is held for that race.
Common questions
Which is flatter, Reims Champagne Run Marathon or Reims Champagne Run Ultramarathon?
Reims Champagne Run Marathon has the lower GAP factor, making it the flatter course on our route model and more favourable on gradient alone.