Flat grade share
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 75.4% Favoured
TCS Lidingöloppet 10K vs Lundaloppet 10K
A data-led head-to-head using sourced race facts and available derived figures under one published methodology.
Data current as ofTCS Lidingöloppet 10K or Lundaloppet 10K — which comes out ahead?
TCS Lidingöloppet 10K and Lundaloppet 10K split the available advantages, so the better choice depends on which metric matters most to the runner.
Route comparison snapshot
TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Mapped route
- Held
- Elevation profile
- Held
- course flatness
- 2.3%
- flat grade share
- 36.0%
- lower ascent
- 162 m
- climbing density
- 16.2 m/km
- net elevation
- 3 m
- maximum grade
- 12.4%
Lundaloppet 10K
- Mapped route
- Held
- Elevation profile
- Held
- course flatness
- 0.6% Favoured
- flat grade share
- 75.4% Favoured
- lower ascent
- 72 m
- climbing density
- 7.2 m/km
- net elevation
- 3 m
- maximum grade
- 7.5%
| Metric | TCS Lidingöloppet 10K | Lundaloppet 10K |
|---|---|---|
| Flat grade share | 36.0% | 75.4% ✓ |
| GAP factor (% slower than flat) | 2.3% | 0.6% ✓ |
| Uphill share | 31.4% | 14.3% |
| Steep-up share | 7.3% | 0.0% |
| Downhill share | 32.6% | 10.3% |
| Total ascent (m) | 162 m | 72 m |
| Climbing density (m/km) | 16.2 m/km | 7.2 m/km |
| Longest climb length (m) | 700 m | 1,340 m |
| Longest climb gain (m) | 38 m | 20 m |
| Longest climb average grade | 5.5% | 1.5% |
| Total descent (m) | 159 m | 69 m |
| Net elevation (m) | 3 m | 3 m |
| Max absolute grade | 12.4% | 7.5% |
| Start elevation (m) | 17 m | 37 m |
| Finish elevation (m) | 21 m | 41 m |
| Scenic score | 100/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Conditions | 89/100 ✓ | 85/100 |
GAP factor (% slower than flat)
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 0.6% Favoured
Uphill share
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 14.3%
Steep-up share
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 0.0%
Downhill share
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 10.3%
Total ascent (m)
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 72 m
Climbing density (m/km)
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 16.2 m/km
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 7.2 m/km
Longest climb length (m)
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 1,340 m
Longest climb gain (m)
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 20 m
Longest climb average grade
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 1.5%
Total descent (m)
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 69 m
Net elevation (m)
Max absolute grade
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 7.5%
Start elevation (m)
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 37 m
Finish elevation (m)
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 41 m
Scenic score
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 100/100 Favoured
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 52/100
Conditions
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 89/100 Favoured
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 85/100
Only metrics available for at least one side are shown. A ✓ marks the better value for each metric (higher-is-better aware). Scores are out of 100 when available. Ascent, climbing density, max absolute grade and median finish describe course or field context and are not marked as better or worse.
Race facts that change the decision
| Fact | TCS Lidingöloppet 10K | Lundaloppet 10K |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule | Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-09-25 (legacy event-level date). | Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-05-09 (legacy event-level date). |
| Location | Lidingö, Sweden | Lund, Sweden |
| Actual distance | 10 km | 10 km |
| raceindex.org mapped route held | Held | Held |
| raceindex.org elevation profile held | Held | Held |
| Surface | Unavailable | Mixed: asphalt, gravel and cobblestones (asfalt, grus och kullersten) |
| Elevation character | Unavailable | Rolling |
| Terrain | Beach | Road |
| Scenery | Parkland, Forest, Countryside, Desert, Island, Historic, Waterfront, Coastal | City, Parkland, Historic, Countryside |
| Atmosphere | Festival, Community, Scenic Tour | Festival, Community |
| Technicality | Unavailable | Moderate |
| Total ascent | 162 m | 72 m |
| Climbing density | 16.2 m/km | 7.2 m/km |
| Total descent | 159 m | 69 m |
| Net elevation | 3 m | 3 m |
| Max absolute grade | 12.4% | 7.5% |
| Flat grade share | 36.0% | 75.4% |
| GAP factor | 2.3% | 0.6% |
| Entry model | Open | Open |
Schedule
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-09-25 (legacy event-level date).
- Lundaloppet 10K
Exact race date not confirmed. Event weekend starts 2026-05-09 (legacy event-level date).
Location
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Lidingö, Sweden
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Lund, Sweden
Actual distance
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 10 km
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 10 km
raceindex.org mapped route held
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Held
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Held
raceindex.org elevation profile held
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Held
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Held
Surface
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Unavailable
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Mixed: asphalt, gravel and cobblestones (asfalt, grus och kullersten)
Elevation character
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Unavailable
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Rolling
Terrain
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Beach
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Road
Scenery
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Parkland, Forest, Countryside, Desert, Island, Historic, Waterfront, Coastal
- Lundaloppet 10K
- City, Parkland, Historic, Countryside
Atmosphere
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Festival, Community, Scenic Tour
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Festival, Community
Technicality
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Unavailable
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Moderate
Total ascent
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 162 m
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 72 m
Climbing density
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 16.2 m/km
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 7.2 m/km
Total descent
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 159 m
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 69 m
Net elevation
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 3 m
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 3 m
Max absolute grade
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 12.4%
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 7.5%
Flat grade share
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 36.0%
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 75.4%
GAP factor
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- 2.3%
- Lundaloppet 10K
- 0.6%
Entry model
- TCS Lidingöloppet 10K
- Open
- Lundaloppet 10K
- Open
Facts are shown only when they exist in the sourced race record; Not held means no sourced value is held for that race.
Common questions
Which is flatter, TCS Lidingöloppet 10K or Lundaloppet 10K?
Lundaloppet 10K has the lower GAP factor, making it the flatter course on our route model and more favourable on gradient alone.